Pages

Monday, May 5, 2025

The Fisherman’s House at Varengeville (1882)

There are moments that do not announce themselves. They don’t carry a title or a reason. They don’t ask to be photographed or remembered. They simply are—quiet as breath, tender as a slant of late afternoon light on an old wooden floor. I’ve come to believe that these are the moments that form the real substance of a life: the unnoticed hours, the simple pauses, the silence shared with another—or borne alone.

Claude Monet’s The Fisherman’s House at Varengeville is a painting of such a moment. It’s not one of his more famous works. It lacks the grandeur of his cathedral series or the hypnotic pull of his water lilies. And yet, I cannot stop thinking about it. I’ve seen many of Monet’s paintings in person, stood close enough to see the layers of color break into abstraction. But this one, though I’ve only known it through reproductions, may be my favorite. It speaks of transience in a way that feels personal.

A modest house sits on a cliff’s edge, tucked into the landscape rather than dominating it. Around it, grasses bloom in a wild tangle, painted with loose, almost dissolving strokes. Beyond the house, the sea opens up in hazy blue, calm and eternal—and yet somehow fleeting. A few white sails, almost ghostlike, drift in the distance. There is no figure in the painting, no path to follow, no center of drama. And still, it breathes. It holds a moment suspended.

This is what Monet did better than almost anyone. He captured not what something was, but what it felt like to be there, just then. He once said, “For me, a landscape does not exist in its own right, since its appearance changes at every moment.” In this way, The Fisherman’s House is not just a painting of a place—it is a portrait of impermanence.

We tend to divide time into milestones—graduations, births, losses, holidays. But it’s the quieter moments that stay with me lately. Watching fog roll in across the hills while drinking coffee alone. Standing at the door and listening to rain fall before anyone else is awake. Or, more rarely, those soft and wordless times shared with another person when nothing needs to be said. You just sit. Or walk. Or notice the same bird call at the same moment. That is where presence lives.

This painting reminds me of such moments. Perhaps the fisherman is gone to sea. Perhaps he’s inside, dozing in the afternoon light. Or perhaps the house is empty altogether, a memory clinging to the hillside. The painting doesn’t say. And that’s its strength. It leaves space—for possibility, for presence, for projection. It becomes a mirror of the viewer’s own solitude.

There are two kinds of fleetingness, I think. The kind we share with others—those rare, gentle moments of mutual awareness, when both people feel the same thing, even if for different reasons. And the kind we experience alone, when the world seems to offer something just for us. A glint of sun on frost. A hawk wheeling overhead. The way the house in the painting seems to lean into the hill like it knows it’s being watched.

Solitude and connection are not opposites; they are companions. One makes the other richer. I imagine the fisherman’s house as a place that has known both. Within its walls, perhaps, laughter and arguments. Outside, long days of labor and longer nights of waiting. And yet, in the frame Monet gives us, none of that is visible. What remains is the moment—the now—as seen from a particular slope, at a particular time, under a particular sky.

Philosopher Gaston Bachelard, in The Poetics of Space, wrote that “the house is one of the greatest powers of integration for the thoughts, memories and dreams of mankind.” This house, though small and unremarkable, becomes that vessel. It gathers within its stone and wood the possibility of every passing day. Not grand gestures, but habitual returns: the turning of the key, the creak of a step, the gaze toward the sea.

It’s no coincidence, I think, that the sea dominates so much of the canvas. Water, in art and myth, is the great symbol of change. It reflects. It erodes. It carries. In The Fisherman’s House, the sea is calm—but not still. There is movement in the strokes. Time is happening, even as it appears to pause. The boats in the distance are small, almost swallowed by the blue. They remind me how far away others can be, even when they’re near. Or how close someone might feel, even when they’ve long gone.

In recent years, I’ve become more attuned to these passing hours—not just as a matter of habit, but of necessity. When I feel lost or overwhelmed, I find myself returning to quiet images like this. They anchor me. They remind me that being here, really here, is sometimes enough. That I don’t have to narrate or fix or strive. I can just sit, breathe, notice.

The Japanese concept of mono no aware—a sensitivity to the ephemeral—feels deeply present here. It is the ache of things passing, but also the grace in having noticed them at all. In this painting, there is no climax. No event. Only that particular light on the side of a house, that curve of land, that blue folding itself into deeper blue.

And yet, something about it feels immense.

It’s not about remembering everything. It’s about letting the moment mean what it means, while you are still inside it. Monet gives us that gift. He paints a world that is already changing. Already passing. But in pausing long enough to see it—to really see it—he reminds us that even the briefest hour can become infinite in memory.

So yes, it’s just a house on a hill. Just some grasses, a sea, a few distant sails.

But then again, isn’t that what a life is?