Portrait of Dr. Heinrich Stadelmann (1922)

Collapse does not always announce itself with spectacle. It often arrives quietly, through silence and gesture, through the normalization of what was once unthinkable. The structures that once upheld shared values begin to soften, and the language of power starts to bend. The effect is not always immediate. Instead, it settles in slowly, as outrage fades and confusion becomes ordinary. This atmosphere, familiar to those living through political uncertainty today, is captured with haunting precision in Otto Dix’s Portrait of Dr. Heinrich Stadelmann (1922), which I encountered recently at a gallery in Toronto.

The experience of viewing this portrait in person was deeply unsettling. Dix’s work confronts the viewer with an image that is not grotesque in the conventional sense, but rather psychologically disoriented. Stadelmann appears physically intact yet spiritually vacant. His skin tone is yellowed, the color of illness or decay. His eyes are wide and glassy, refusing to engage with the viewer. His black suit is meticulously tailored, and the backdrop—a red curtain and patterned wallpaper—suggests wealth or status. However, there is no comfort in the composition. The man appears hollowed out by something internal, not wounded by trauma but consumed by the invisible.

Dr. Heinrich Stadelmann was a psychiatrist and a professor, a man trained to understand the mind. Yet in Dix’s rendering, he appears unable to process the world around him. The portrait does not offer clarity about what he fears or what he anticipates. It presents him as one suspended in uncertainty. He exists in a liminal space—a threshold between past and future, between the recognizable and the unknowable. Dix’s 1922 Weimar Germany was itself such a space. The empire was gone. The republic was young, destabilized by hyperinflation, political violence, and cultural fragmentation. The Nazi Party had not yet taken power, but the foundations of liberal society were already eroding.

This context is essential to understanding the portrait. It is not only a representation of an individual but also a cultural document. Dix’s art often resists sentimentality. His portraiture, particularly during the early 1920s, is diagnostic. He does not flatter. He reveals. In this image, he offers the viewer a model of the professional class in decline—not due to external attack, but due to internal exhaustion. Stadelmann does not appear complicit in the failures of his time, but he does appear paralyzed. He is aware that something is shifting, yet powerless to respond. This awareness without action, knowledge without agency, defines the moral ambiguity at the center of the image.

This moral ambiguity also resonates with the political condition of the contemporary United States. The period following the 2016 presidential election and the rise of MAGA-aligned politics bears many of the same features that defined Weimar Germany’s liminal state. Institutions appear outwardly intact but inwardly compromised. Public discourse has grown increasingly polarized and performative. Like Weimar, the present moment often feels like a space in-between, where the old narratives of democracy no longer persuade, and the new order remains undefined. It is not the chaos of revolution that is most disorienting. It is the slow, visible unraveling of norms, accompanied by a population uncertain of how to respond.

The portrait’s relevance, therefore, extends far beyond its original historical moment. Dix invites viewers to examine the psychology of inaction. Stadelmann’s hollow expression, his meticulous dress, and his rigid posture serve as symbols of outward control masking inward collapse. He appears to maintain social performance, but the vitality of belief—whether in science, governance, or progress—seems to have fled. His hands hang limply at his sides, neither clenched nor expressive. His presence is defined by absence. He is, as the anthropologist Victor Turner might suggest, a figure suspended in liminality, no longer belonging to what came before, and not yet capable of becoming what follows.

Dix, who fought in World War I and saw firsthand the physical and psychological devastation of conflict, brings to this portrait a particular sense of tension. Unlike his more graphic war etchings, this work expresses anxiety not through violence, but through stillness. It is a portrait of a man living before the disaster, rather than after it. In that way, it may be even more terrifying. The viewer, too, becomes implicated. We recognize the signs. We feel the warning. And yet, like Stadelmann, we remain unsure of what to do.

Standing in front of this painting, I found myself unable to turn away. Not because of its size or dramatic color, but because it reflected something uncomfortably close to my own condition. It was not only the portrait of a man from 1922. It was the portrait of a society on the edge of transformation. And in that sense, it was also a portrait of the present.

Dix offers no resolution. He does not provide guidance or redemption. Instead, he allows the viewer to dwell in the unresolved. In doing so, he reminds us that it is often in these in-between spaces that the most important moral questions must be asked. Not after collapse. Not during catastrophe. But before, when there is still time to respond.

Jurassic World Rebirth

League of Denial: The NFL's Concussion Crisis

Marnie

The Astros Edge: Triumph and Scandal in Major League Baseball

Pigwich

Pony Express Museum

Walking through the Pony Express Museum today, surrounded by the smell of old leather and oiled wood, by reconstructed bunks and dioramas of wind-chapped boys changing horses in the snow, I found myself thinking—not just of the past—but of The Postman. Both versions.

In David Brin’s novel, the ruins of America aren’t rebuilt by power or violence, but by myth—by a man who puts on a dead letter carrier’s uniform and pretends there’s still a government, still a system, still a future. It’s not heroic in the traditional sense. The Postman lies. He improvises. He stumbles forward. And yet his act—his fraud—sparks belief. Whole communities rekindle around the fragile, beautiful idea that someone still cares enough to carry the mail.

In the book, the great threat comes in the form of artificial intelligence. Cyclops—the machine that once ruled—becomes a mirror for human fear and folly, a reminder that we outsource too much of our soul to cold efficiency. In the end, it’s not machines that restore the world—it’s flawed people choosing hope, one delivery at a time.

In Kevin Costner’s film, the threat shifts. Gone are the machines. In their place, the Holnists—a hyper-militarized, white supremacist cult that replaces governance with brute force. They burn books. They draft the unwilling. They rewrite history to suit their ideology. And they are defeated not by superior weapons, but by a man with a letter bag and a half-made-up story.

Both versions ask the same question the Pony Express once answered:

What are we willing to risk to stay connected?

Walking through the museum today—past the saddle bags, the hand-written letters, the route maps dotted with long-gone stations—I couldn’t help but feel how timely it all was. This wasn’t nostalgia. This was prophecy.

The world feels fractured again. The wires we once trusted feel frayed. Truth itself is under siege. And here I was, standing in a building that once launched riders into the dark, trusting that a relay of strangers across plains and deserts would see the message through.

It’s easy to forget, in all the romance of the Pony Express, that this was a system built on trust. You handed a message to someone you’d never met, who gave it to someone else, and on and on until, miraculously, it reached its destination. There were no guarantees. Just commitment.

That’s the part I keep coming back to.

The riders were boys, the horses were tired, the storms were real, and yet the letters got through.

In a time when we don’t always know who to believe, when lies travel faster than mail ever did, I find myself clinging to this myth—not because it’s perfect, but because it reminds me of what civilization actually requires: ordinary people doing something extraordinary—not for profit, not for fame, but because it matters.

Because a letter is a promise. A story is a bridge. A uniform—real or imagined—is sometimes enough to hold a country together.

The Pony Express lasted just 18 months. The Postman never existed.

But standing in this museum today, both felt more real than the headlines.

The Pony Express

The Pony Express began in St. Joseph, Missouri—not just geographically, but symbolically. It was the last outpost of the American East, where the rails ended and the wide, wild West began. In 1860, when the nation teetered on the edge of civil war and California felt as distant as China, speed was power. And there was no faster way to move a message across the continent than a man on horseback, riding hard and alone.

It started at the Patee House in St. Joe, where the Central Overland California and Pikes Peak Express Company had its headquarters. William H. Russell, Alexander Majors, and William B. Waddell—freight magnates and empire dreamers—saw an opportunity: a fast mail service that could connect the coasts. The idea was bold, the execution even bolder.

On April 3, 1860, at exactly 7:15 p.m., the first westbound Pony Express rider galloped out of St. Joseph’s streets and into legend. He carried a leather mochila packed with telegrams, newspapers, and private letters. A crowd gathered to cheer him on. A steamboat waited in the Missouri River below, cannon ready to fire in salute. The East Coast had wired its thoughts to the edge of the frontier—and now those words had sprouted wings.

The route was unforgiving: 1,966 miles of plains, desert, and mountain, all the way to Sacramento, California. Riders changed horses every 10 to 15 miles at relay stations, many of which were little more than a log hut and a water barrel. Every 75 to 100 miles, a new rider took over, grabbing the mochila and racing on. The horses were light, fast, and bred for stamina—Mustangs, Morgans, and pintos. The riders were even lighter. Most were teenage boys, paid $100 a month, often carrying a Colt revolver and a slim hope of surviving the journey.

From St. Joseph, the route ran through Kansas to Nebraska, cut across the wind-whipped plains of Colorado, and entered the vast emptiness of Wyoming. Riders crossed the Continental Divide and dropped into the Utah Territory, navigating salt flats and sagebrush, then entered the high deserts and steep passes of Nevada. From there, it was a final push across the Sierra Nevada into California’s Sacramento Valley.

It took ten days, sometimes less. Ten days to deliver news across a continent, to carry letters that could change business deals, marriages, or wars. The East Coast could now speak to the West not in weeks, but in days.

For a time, the Pony Express was the fastest communication system in the world. But it was doomed almost from the start.

It was expensive. Dangerous. Dependent on weather and war. Riders faced Indian raids, blizzards, floods, and bandits. And in October 1861—just 18 months after that first ride—the transcontinental telegraph was completed. Wires now stretched from Omaha to Sacramento. Messages could travel in minutes. The Pony Express was finished.

It had lasted only a year and a half. But in that short time, it carved itself into the American imagination. Not because of efficiency or profit—it lost money—but because of myth. Because of what it represented: courage, speed, sacrifice, and the mad ambition to link a fractured country with the thundering hooves of a single rider.

You can still stand at the Pony Express stables in St. Joe, a few blocks from the Patee House, where it all began. The building is now a museum, and inside is the original saddle, the pistols, the letters, the legends. And just outside, the river still runs, and the land still leans west.

Jesse James Home and Museum

The Jesse James Home is a small, white house with green trim and a bullet hole that never healed.

It’s not grand. It’s not cinematic. And maybe that’s the point. For all the legend, Jesse James died in a rented house on Lafayette Street in St. Joseph, Missouri, standing on a chair, reaching to dust a picture frame. He was unarmed. He had just taken off his gun belt. The man who shot him was Bob Ford—a gang member, a friend, and, for some, the ultimate traitor. Jesse didn’t die on horseback or in a shootout. He died domestic, mundane, betrayed. Shot in the back of the head by someone who had shared his breakfast.

The house remains, and so does the hole in the wall where Ford’s bullet exited. That’s what draws you in: not just the story, but the evidence. Physical. Unavoidable. The house is not a reconstruction—it’s the very room where myth met mortality. Inside, time holds its breath.

But outside that house, the story keeps moving.

Not everyone believed Jesse James died that day in 1882.

In fact, from the moment his body was laid out at the Patee House Hotel and identified by neighbors, reporters, and family, rumors began to swirl. The face was bloated, some said. The beard looked strange. And why had the sheriff allowed Ford—who admitted to the killing—to claim the reward money and avoid punishment so easily?

For decades, the whispers persisted: Jesse faked his death. Jesse fled west. Jesse was living in Texas. Or Mexico. Or under an assumed name in some town where no one asked questions. Every generation seems to resurrect its outlaws.

And so, in 1995—over a century later—Jesse James was dug up.

His body, long buried in Kearney, Missouri, in the James family plot, was exhumed by forensic scientists from the University of Kansas. They used DNA from two of his maternal relatives and compared it to samples taken from two of Jesse’s molars. The tests were definitive: a 99.7% match. The man buried in that grave—the man who died in this house—was Jesse James.

Science, it seemed, had killed the myth once and for all.

But conspiracy is a stubborn thing. Some still claim the wrong man was buried. That the DNA was planted. That the real Jesse James lived to old age under the alias “J. Frank Dalton,” who died in Texas in 1951 and insisted until the end that he was the true outlaw. He had the scars, the stories, the swagger. But his story unraveled under scrutiny, and the legend now rests more comfortably in the James family cemetery—alongside a mother who outlived him by thirty years and fiercely protected his memory.

The Jesse James Home doesn’t dwell on these conspiracies. It presents the facts: the room, the bullet hole, the gun, the death. But behind that, you can feel the flicker of uncertainty that every great legend carries. Was it really him? Why did he take off his guns that morning? Did he know it was coming?

The room won’t answer you. It just holds the silence. The kind that comes after a gunshot. The kind that follows betrayal. The kind that only deepens when history tries to tell a story that people would rather imagine differently.

Jesse James was shot here. Of that, we are mostly certain. But what he became after death—martyr, outlaw saint, myth, ghost—that part still rides on. Somewhere between the science and the folklore, between the floorboards and the grave.

And maybe that’s what keeps people coming to St. Joseph. Not just to see where Jesse James died. But to stand in the last place he was certainly alive.

Patee House Museum

The Patee House doesn’t feel like a museum at first. It feels like a place that forgot to die.

Rising four stories above the quiet brick streets of St. Joseph, Missouri, the building once housed luxury travelers, Civil War generals, outlaws, and telegraph operators. Built in 1858 as a grand hotel, the Patee House was the finest lodging west of the Mississippi—an opulent waypoint at the edge of the American frontier. You can still see it in the woodwork, in the broad staircases, in the central atrium that now holds a full-sized carousel and a locomotive. The place doesn’t just preserve history—it collects it.

This was no ordinary hotel. For a brief time, it served as the headquarters for the Pony Express—arguably the most romanticized mail service in American history. From this very building, in April 1860, riders galloped west carrying saddlebags of letters across the continent. Though the service only lasted 18 months before being replaced by the transcontinental telegraph, the legend lived on. And here, it lives still. There’s a reconstructed telegraph office. Pony Express artifacts. Maps of the route. Saddles. Stories.

But the building’s history is more layered than just fast horses and frontier lore.

During the Civil War, the Union commandeered it as a military headquarters and provost marshal's office. After the war, it returned to private use. It was a women’s college for a time, then fell into disrepair, became a factory, and was nearly lost. But St. Joseph, to its credit, knew what it had—and saved it.

Perhaps the most haunting chapter of the Patee House story came in April 1882, when the lifeless body of Jesse James was brought here and placed on public view. Just hours after he was assassinated by Robert Ford in his home a few blocks away, Jesse’s body was laid out for the curious and the grieving to see. People paid 25 cents to view it. A man once hunted across the Midwest became, in death, a roadside attraction.

And the Patee House remembers that too.

Walk through its many rooms, and you’ll find the Jesse James exhibit: the guns, the newspaper clippings, the death mask, the blood-stained floorboards from the house where he was shot. It is macabre and reverent at once—less a celebration of violence than a meditation on legacy, myth, and the strange American compulsion to immortalize the outlaw.

But it’s not all grit and guns. The museum is packed with Americana: a recreated 1860s saloon, a general store, old typewriters and washing machines, barber chairs, and children's toys from a century ago. There’s a room of antique bicycles, a dentist’s office that looks like it was abandoned mid-cleaning, a parlor staged as though the 19th century never ended. It is equal parts history, memory, and time capsule.

What makes the Patee House Museum so special is that it doesn’t choose a single story. It doesn’t reduce itself to one era, one moment, one figure. Instead, it opens every door and lets you wander. Upstairs to the parlor. Downstairs to the jail cells. Past the printing press, through the schoolroom, across the porch. Every floorboard creaks with a different memory.

We often think of museums as static—glass cases, neat labels, no touching. The Patee House resists that. It invites you in like a home, then reveals that the home has lived a hundred lives. It is layered, contradictory, messy in the best way. Just like the country it reflects.

And when you step outside, back onto the quiet street, you can almost hear the echo of hooves, the clang of the telegraph, the whispers of outlaws and officers. The past, in St. Joseph, isn’t distant.

It’s just upstairs.

Walter Cronkite Memorial

Walter Cronkite’s voice didn’t just report history—it became it.

The Walter Cronkite Memorial, housed fittingly on the campus of Missouri Western State University in his birthplace of St. Joseph, Missouri, is not a shrine to nostalgia. It’s a study in credibility. In trust. In how a single human voice, clear and unadorned, can hold a nation steady through triumph and tragedy.

Cronkite was born in St. Joseph in 1916. His family moved to Kansas City, and then to Texas, but Missouri claims him with the quiet pride reserved for native sons who made good—not just in fame, but in principle. He studied journalism at the University of Texas at Austin, dropped out before graduating, and started as a newspaper reporter. But it was radio—and later, television—where his voice found its place.

He joined CBS News in 1950, just as the young medium of television was coming into its own. Cronkite’s rise came not from theatrics or bombast, but from calm presence, unshakable tone, and a face that seemed carved from the very notion of dependability. By 1962, he had become the anchor of CBS Evening News. He would remain there until 1981.

But to say he anchored the news is too small a phrase. He embodied it.

The memorial at Missouri Western spans his career not just through artifacts—though there are many—but through storytelling. A replica of the CBS Newsroom sets the tone. Interactive exhibits allow visitors to hear Cronkite's voice reporting on the most consequential events of the 20th century. There are clips from Vietnam, from the moon landing, from Watergate, and of course, from November 22, 1963.

It was Cronkite, glasses off, eyes damp, who delivered the news that President Kennedy had died. His words were spare, his silence longer than network television allowed. But it was real. And millions watching remember not just what he said—but how he said it.

When he declared after the Tet Offensive in 1968 that the war in Vietnam would end in stalemate, it sent shockwaves. President Lyndon Johnson reportedly said, “If I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost Middle America.” Such was the power of his trust.

He narrated the Apollo missions with a kind of boyish wonder that never undermined his gravitas. When Neil Armstrong took that first step onto the lunar surface, it was Cronkite who gave it to us—hands on his cheeks, smile widening, disbelief melting into awe.

And through it all, he signed off the same way, night after night: “And that’s the way it is.”

Today, in an age of opinion dressed as fact, of 24-hour noise and endless spin, the Cronkite Memorial feels like a cathedral of clarity. A place not just to remember a man, but to reflect on what it meant to trust a voice—one voice—to carry the weight of a nation’s news.

There are no golden statues or flashy projections. Just walls of memory, quiet screens, archival footage, and the enduring question: What happens to democracy when we lose trust in the people who speak for it?

Walter Cronkite didn’t chase celebrity. He earned credibility. And standing in that memorial, just a few miles from the river that bore his name into the world, you realize that he wasn’t just “the most trusted man in America.”

He was what journalism used to be. And what it might, one day, become again.

Kansas City Chiefs Training Camp